TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. – 2.
Introduction 3.
The Work of the Task Force 4.
Elementary Task Force Members 5.
Section 1. Revisiting
the 2002 EFTF Plan
Governing Assumptions 6.
Part
1. Fiscal Capacity 7.
Cost Reductions Relating to Elementary Schools 7.
Adams / Jack vs. East End
Operating Cost Comparison 8.
Consolidation Options and Savings Estimates 9.
Part
2. Enrollment Trends 10.
Examining the 2002 EFTF With Current
Populations 10.
Current School Enrollments 11.
Declining Enrollments 11.
Declining Student and Family and
Populations 11.
Understanding Declining
Enrollments 12.
“Simple Principal Driving Big
Economic Change” 12.
– 13.
Kindergarten Enrollment 13.
English Language Learners 14.
Predicting Enrollments 15.
Private Enrollment / Other Than
Portland Public Schools 16.
Elementary “School of Choice”
and “Programming Choice” 16.
National Enrollment Estimates 17.
Housing Trends 17.
Part 3. Community
Use of Facilities 18.
Part 4. Educational
Mandates 18.
Part 5. Economic
Diversity 18.
Section 2.
Consolidating Elementary Schools 19.
Part
1. Defining “Anchor Schools” 19.
Part
2. School Configurations 20.
Seven Elementary School –
Options 1 through 7 and 1A 20.
– 24. Eight
Elementary School – Options 8 and 9 25. Six Elementary Schools
– Option 10 26.
Section 3. Unresolved
Issues 27.
Section 4. Conclusion 28.
Appendix 29. 1.
Free and Reduced Populations by School 30. 2.
Original 2002 EFTF Plan – Bundles 1, 2, and 3 31.
– 33. 3.
Current Elementary School Populations and Components 34.
– 35. 4.
Enrollments by Area and Declining Family Populations 36.
5. ELL Populations 37.
6. Kindergarten Enrollment 38.
– 39.
7. Recent Housing
Developments 40.
8. Future Housing Developments 41.
9. Housing Units For Sale 42.
10. Public Housing and the
Portland Schools 43.
– 44.
References
45. – 46.
Acknowledgements
47. – 48.
1. 2002 EFTF Plan
2.
City of Portland Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan
3. Portland Schools Ten Year
Capital Improvement Plan
4. 2001-2002 & 2004-2005
School Facilities Priority List
5. 2000 Portland Census
6. Maine State Planning Office
Procedures for Population estimates
7. National Statistics, Elementary
School Size
8. Enrollment Projections,
National Center for Educational Statistics
9. Housing Development Data
10. 1999 Semple & Drane School
Condition Report – Summary Only
The Portland Public Schools,
one of the oldest school systems in the country, has seen a multitude of school
configurations, and changes in the decades that preceded us. From teaching
kindergarten in the private homes, to the small neighborhood elementary school
of 8 to12 classrooms, to the excitement of “expeditionary learning,” it has
been the responsibility of many different stakeholders over the years to guide
the changes that produce quality-learning environments.
Each generation has produced
education strategies that have evolved into the world of modern education. As
with the evolution of education, so too have buildings evolved. It is in this
environment that future generations of students will access great learning
opportunities.
The Portland Public Schools
2002 Elementary Facilities Plan was designed with “stop signs” following each
phase / ”bundle” in order to review data regarding student enrollment, fiscal
capacity and educational programming. Therefore, with
Phase/Bundle 1 - Jack-Adams-Riverton
underway, the School Committee appointed the 2005-2006 Elementary Facilities
Task Force.
The 2005-2006 Elementary
Facilities Task Force was charged with examining the mandates of the 2002
Elementary Facilities Plan, and to gather and analyze data to determine if the
plan held validity at this current juncture. An additional charge was to make
recommendations to the School Committee should the plan need updating based on
changes since its’ inception. If a conclusion were arrived at in terms of
consolidations, renovations, rebuilding, or status quo, this recommendation
would be forwarded to the School Committee for future consideration as well.
While this committee did not
reach an overall consensus, we believe we have gathered and examined the data
necessary to make a decision that is in the best interest of our future
learners and the taxpayers of the city of Portland. It is with those interests
in mind that this report is offered.
March
2006
The Work of the Task Force
Task
Force Updates Plan for Portland's Elementary Schools
From The EFTF Web Page – November 2005
Portland's
Elementary Facilities Task Force is updating a plan for renovating, replacing
and consolidating the city's 8 mainland elementary schools[1].
The new plan will take into account current and projected student enrollment,
educational trends and available funding.
The
task force, established in 1998, includes city and school officials, parents
and staff. The task force's recommendations laid the groundwork for the
comprehensive elementary facilities plan adopted by the Portland School
Committee in November 2002. The plan called for rebuilding or renovating eight
"anchor schools" in addition to the island schools and closing three
others.
Since
then, Baxter Elementary School has closed and the East End Community School is
nearing completion. It will open in September 2006, serving all of the students
now at Adams Elementary School as well as some students at Reiche, Clifford and
other schools.
Clifford
has been named as the state's highest priority for reconstruction funds. The
task force will look at the possibility of combining Clifford's population with
that of another school and recommend three or four possibilities. While no
timetable has been set for the task force's work, it is expected to take
several months. The Portland School Committee will make the final decision.
"Given
our declining enrollment, it is inevitable that some elementary schools will
close during the coming years," said Portland Superintendent Mary Jo
O'Connor. "I am confident that the Elementary Facilities Task Force will
review all of the data in a thoughtful, objective manner. Working together, we
can build the best possible elementary schools to serve our children and future
generations."
Portland School Committee member Jason Toothaker chairs the Elementary Facilities Task Force. Michelle Hedrich serves as vice chair.
Butterfield, Michele mbutterfield@maine.rr.com 774-9663
Parent, Longfellow School
Carr, Donna dcarr@portlandmaine.gov 761-0857
District 3 City Councilor
Hedrich, Michelle mhedrich@maine.rr.com 797-0836
Former School Committee Chair, Committee Vice-Chair
Holton, Liz eholton@maine.rr.com 775-6267
Parent, Presumpscot School
Mallory, Kevin mallok@portlandschools.org 874-8240
Transportation Director, PPS
Morrison, Marysue morrim@portlandschools.org 874-8180
Principal, Nathan Clifford School
O’Connor, Mary Jo oconnm@portlandschools.org 874-8111
Superintendent of Schools, PPS
Paulsen, Richard paulsr@portlandschools.org 874-8125
Finance Director, PPS
Sherwood, Douglas sherwd@portlandschools.org 874-5342
Facilities Director, PPS
Suslovic, Edward esuslovic@portlandmaine.gov 772-5615
At Large City Councilor
Toothaker, Jason toothj@portlandschools.org 450-0033
School Committee Member, Committee Chair
Turner, David turned@portlandschools.org 874-8180
Assistant Principal, Nathan Clifford School
Wellehan, Jane janewellehan@gwi.net 871-7103
Parent, Nathan Clifford School
Alcorn, Ellen alcore@portlandschools.org 761-9045
Chair, Portland School Committee
Cohen, James jcohen@portlandmaine.gov 797-9638
Leeman, Cheryl cl@portlandmaine.gov 773-4161
Governing Assumptions
The
first task of the current EFTF was to examine the governing assumptions of the
original plan to determine if changes would be necessary to guide future plans.[2]
The following is a list of governing assumption that the EFTF reviewed at the start of the committee’s deliberations in November 2005. It was agreed to by committee members that economic diversity should be added to the list of Primary Assumptions. The committee further agreed that all further assumptions remained valid.
Ten year plan to be
reviewed in stages based on the following Primary Assumptions:
· Fiscal Capacity
· Enrollment Trends
· Community Needs
· Educational Mandates
· Economic Diversity (Added November 2005)
Other assumptions
include:
· Provide
Adequate Program Sites (FLS, ESL, Sped, etc.). Limit movement.
Part 1. - Fiscal Capacity
Because the Nathan Clifford School is recognized by the
Department of Education as the number one school in the State of Maine needing
major capital improvements (which could include replacement or renovation),
state funding is assured for this school.[3]
The availability of this funding drove much of the process when the task force
considered available options. However, because state funding is not immediate,
the task force, working with the city, then reviewed the fiscal capacity of the
City of Portland to finance any new school construction projects. Provisions in
the city’s Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan[4]
provides guidance in terms of availability of resources for agreed upon future
school construction projects.
Cost Reductions Related to Closing
Elementary Schools[5]
The committee asked for and received extensive data on the operational
costs for schools that might be considered for consolidation. These costs are
essentially associated with what it takes to keeps the lights on, to heat the
building, etc. Custodial staffing was also considered as an operational cost.
Additionally, deferred maintenance was tracked separately. While no particular
option was recommended, these numbers are readily accessible for future
reference to apply to any scenario. Additionally, a cost for the new East End
School was established and used as a comparison model for any new construction.
|
Cost
Category |
Baxter |
Clifford |
Longfellow |
Presumpscot |
Reiche |
West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
$10,500 |
$22,900 |
$19,100 |
$20,200 |
$76,500 |
$25,500 |
|
Pole
Lighting |
$900 |
$2,000 |
$1,800 |
$1,300 |
$3,700 |
$1,300 |
|
Oil |
$20,900 |
$30,200 |
$27,600 |
$21,300 |
$84,200 |
$43,700 |
|
Natural
Gas |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$48,300 |
$200 |
|
Propane |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$2,400 |
$0 |
$1,800 |
|
Water/Sewer |
$1,800 |
$5,000 |
$3,800 |
$4,800 |
$7,800 |
$2,800 |
|
Telephones |
$1,400 |
$3,300 |
$3,000 |
$2,200 |
$6,000 |
$2,200 |
|
Waste
Disposal |
$2,747 |
$6,612 |
$7,180 |
$8,496 |
$16,203 |
$1,850 |
|
Recycling |
$300 |
$600 |
$500 |
$400 |
$1,100 |
$400 |
|
Plowing/Mowing |
$1,900 |
$4,400 |
$3,900 |
$2,900 |
$7,800 |
$2,900 |
|
Pest
Management |
$0 |
$468 |
$0 |
$516 |
$1,092 |
$400 |
|
Security |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
|
Fire
Extinguishers |
$250 |
$250 |
$250 |
$250 |
$250 |
$250 |
|
Maintenance
Supplies |
$2,500 |
$5,900 |
$5,300 |
$3,900 |
$10,800 |
$3,900 |
|
Custodial
Supplies |
$2,700 |
$6,300 |
$5,700 |
$4,200 |
$11,500 |
$4,200 |
|
Sub-total |
$46,897 |
$88,930 |
$79,130 |
$73,862 |
$276,245 |
$92,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custodial
Staffing |
$30,800[6] |
$103,000 |
$119,300 |
$88,500 |
$204,200 |
$80,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$77,697 |
$191,930 |
$198,430 |
$162,362 |
$480,445 |
$173,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Costs[7] |
$1,280,000 |
$8,575,000 |
$9,490,000 |
$1,125,000 |
$4,635,000 |
$800,000 |
As defined in the chart below, a comparison was done regarding the costs of operating Adams and Jack separately, against those projected operating costs for the new East End School.
|
Cost
Category |
East End |
|
Jack |
Adams |
Combined |
Difference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
$36,100 |
|
$26,800 |
$14,300 |
$41,100 |
$5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pole
Lighting |
$3,000 |
|
$2,000 |
$900 |
$2,900 |
-$100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|